(1NT) - 2NT A new idea?
#1
Posted 2014-August-21, 09:38
Against a strong NT 3m can be wide ranging, since your side is not too worried about missing game. You might bid 3♣ with Qx xxx KQJ9xxx x or Ax Qxx KQJ9xx xx. However, vs a weak NT it hurts your constructive bidding to lump the preempts in with the constructive hands. You can't pass with the second hand for fear of being shut out, but you'd also like to eat your cake and preempt with the first.
So I suggest using 2NT as a preempt in either minor, keeping the 3m bids for the constructive hands with a 6+ card minor. At least against a weak NT.
The rationale behind having it this way round is that the opps are more likely to want to penalise you when you have the constructive hand (since they may not have a game). It also hurts their constructive auction when you "preempt" with 2NT by taking away the opps' cue bid.
You will lose the ablity to show a hand with both minors (most people's use for 2NT) but this is not a particularly important or common hand type.
#2
Posted 2014-August-21, 09:47
#3
Posted 2014-August-21, 10:03
Unlike hrothgar (apparently) I don't think being able to show both minors over a hand that most of the field will open 1m is particularly high priority.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#4
Posted 2014-August-21, 11:38
hrothgar, on 2014-August-21, 09:47, said:
I thought this was "bridge", but I was informed that this isn't GCC legal, as bids higher than 2♣ over their "natural" NT opening must have at least one known anchor suit. Absolutely ridiculous, of course.
#5
Posted 2014-August-21, 12:17
broze, on 2014-August-21, 09:38, said:
So I suggest using 2NT as a preempt in either minor, keeping the 3m bids for the constructive hands with a 6+ card minor. At least against a weak NT.
...
You will lose the ablity to show a hand with both minors (most people's use for 2NT) but this is not a particularly important or common hand type.
You also lose the ability to show a GF 2-suiter, but then again, when's the last time that came up?
I like this idea and will probably try it.
#6
Posted 2014-August-21, 12:20
broze, on 2014-August-21, 09:38, said:
I play this the other way around with two of my partners.
London UK
#7
Posted 2014-August-21, 13:16
#8
Posted 2014-August-21, 13:25
#9
Posted 2014-August-21, 13:35
#10
Posted 2014-August-21, 14:58
PhilKing, on 2014-August-21, 13:35, said:
Either way, you can put other hand types into 2NT. Can any of you tell me what you do?
#12
Posted 2014-August-21, 16:34
However it does much seem better to me to have the 2N as the weak hand. You lose the ability to have pard crank up the auction but you avoid giving the opps a cue bid, which seems more valuable to me.
Do all you people who use it also employ against a strong NT?
#13
Posted 2014-August-21, 16:56
#14
Posted 2014-August-21, 17:01
broze, on 2014-August-21, 16:34, said:
Bidding only 2NT is quite bad when you have diamonds, because you allow them space for Stayman, transfers, and a balanced-values double
Quote
Yes.
#15
Posted 2014-August-21, 20:11
2N is a single suited preempt, puppeting partner to 3♣.
3-bids are Meckwell calls promising a 4-loser hand.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#16
Posted 2014-August-21, 21:09
GCC requires a known suit for overcalls other than 2♣.
So, 2N as unnamed minor or as unspeciiied 2 suiter are out.
too bad 2♦ as a unnamed major would be nice.
Note: balancing seat anything is ok.
Maybe 2N as a cuebid then ok!? Ask the lawyers lol
#17
Posted 2014-August-21, 22:04
- Games in almost any other country.
- WBF games.
- ACBL Mid-Chart or higher games.
- GCC+ games in some districts of the ACBL.
#18
Posted 2014-August-22, 17:13
I have had several players play "Suck-tion" against my weak NT at Mid-chart; "the next suit up, or the other two, or, yeah, I guess it was the suit bid, because he forgot again", for instance.
#19
Posted 2014-August-24, 03:59