BBO Discussion Forums: What should we use 2D for? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What should we use 2D for?

#21 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2018-August-08, 00:58

Looks better to me. Still have a vacant 2D opening.
0

#22 User is offline   Kungsgeten 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 943
  • Joined: 2012-April-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2018-August-10, 12:46

It is leaning towards playing 2D as a normal weak two, but we'll allow a good five card suit first seat non-vul (and also in third seat).
0

#23 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2018-August-11, 02:49

Or you could say [ ... and responder has 5S and 4H, and both are weak ... ] that 2♦ is Ekrens with at least 54xx. Use it to fill holes. I play natural weak2 and Ekrens (with different partners!) and prefer Ekrens. Yes, 2♦ is forcing if you want to include a strong option (mine is 21+ 3-suiter).
0

#24 User is offline   nullve 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,299
  • Joined: 2014-April-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway
  • Interests:partscores

Posted 2018-August-11, 08:31

 fromageGB, on 2018-August-11, 02:49, said:

I play natural weak2 and Ekrens (with different partners!) and prefer Ekrens. Yes, 2♦ is forcing if you want to include a strong option (mine is 21+ 3-suiter).

I play Ekrens 2♦ as weak or GF in one partnership, but the opening is still NOT forcing. I'd pass 2♦ with 12 hcp, 2263, for example. Why wouldn't you? :)
0

#25 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2018-August-11, 08:49

 nullve, on 2018-August-11, 08:31, said:

I play Ekrens 2♦ as weak or GF in one partnership, but the opening is still NOT forcing. I'd pass 2♦ with 12 hcp, 2263, for example. Why wouldn't you? :)

Maybe because partner may be a 24 count 4144? If 2♦ does not have a strong option then pass is an option. Partner did once have a long diamond hand and passed, but of course I did have the strong option.
0

#26 User is offline   nullve 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,299
  • Joined: 2014-April-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway
  • Interests:partscores

Posted 2018-August-11, 10:07

 fromageGB, on 2018-August-11, 08:49, said:

Maybe because partner may be a 24 count 4144? If 2♦ does not have a strong option then pass is an option. Partner did once have a long diamond hand and passed, but of course I did have the strong option.

So you don't think Pass has the highest expected value on the hand type I gave?

FWIW (not much, I guess), here are 100 random weak-or-GF Ekrens 2♦ deals where Responder has 12 hcp, 2263:

Spoiler

0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

12 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 12 guests, 0 anonymous users