Page 1 of 1
Your call over weak NT
#1
Posted 2022-August-06, 05:32
South
♠K87
♥4
♦4
♣AJT98732
MPs, NS vuln against a decent club pair (likely the strongest EW pair in a mixed field).
RHO dealer and opens a 12-14 1NT. Your defence to 1NT is 2♣=Landy, everything else natural. Your call?
♠K87
♥4
♦4
♣AJT98732
MPs, NS vuln against a decent club pair (likely the strongest EW pair in a mixed field).
RHO dealer and opens a 12-14 1NT. Your defence to 1NT is 2♣=Landy, everything else natural. Your call?
#3
Posted 2022-August-06, 06:50
paulg, on 2022-August-06, 05:35, said:
At this vulnerability I can see nothing good happening if I bid.
That might be true, but I still think you are worth 3♣ just to take away a level of bidding from the ops. and to tell partner the hand you have. 4♣ is one too many at this vulnerability, though we're playing MPs here. At IMPs definitely not, but it all depends how aggressive you are. 4♣ takes away two rounds of bidding And it will be difficult for the ops. to X.
The one scene I do not want to happen is to pass, and for them to bid 2♦ (Transfer to ♥) - 3♥ (super accept - I do not know if you play super accept with weak NT) and then for me to try to come into the auction now. I would rather bid that long ♣ suit on the first round than the second.
#6
Posted 2022-August-06, 09:45
Three different responses. My partner held this hand and decided to overcall 3♣ to which I responded 3NT. The full deal:
I was playing for a semi-constructive hand, something like six clubs to the AK and one or two honors outside. I didn't expect something as freakish as the actual hand, but fine, after the defence play three rounds of hearts (switching to the ♦Q holds it to nine tricks) I cash all my tricks taking the certain finesse (they aren't opening 1NT on a stiff small club, and if they have, I will force a smile and congratulate them) I make +2. No-one else found it, two pairs were in 5♣, one making and one going one down.
I was playing for a semi-constructive hand, something like six clubs to the AK and one or two honors outside. I didn't expect something as freakish as the actual hand, but fine, after the defence play three rounds of hearts (switching to the ♦Q holds it to nine tricks) I cash all my tricks taking the certain finesse (they aren't opening 1NT on a stiff small club, and if they have, I will force a smile and congratulate them) I make +2. No-one else found it, two pairs were in 5♣, one making and one going one down.
#7
Posted 2022-August-06, 10:50
AL78, on 2022-August-06, 09:45, said:
Three different responses. My partner held this hand and decided to overcall 3♣ to which I responded 3NT. The full deal:
I was playing for a semi-constructive hand, something like six clubs to the AK and one or two honors outside. I didn't expect something as freakish as the actual hand, but fine, after the defence play three rounds of hearts (switching to the ♦Q holds it to nine tricks) I cash all my tricks taking the certain finesse (they aren't opening 1NT on a stiff small club, and if they have, I will force a smile and congratulate them) I make +2. No-one else found it, two pairs were in 5♣, one making and one going one down.
I was playing for a semi-constructive hand, something like six clubs to the AK and one or two honors outside. I didn't expect something as freakish as the actual hand, but fine, after the defence play three rounds of hearts (switching to the ♦Q holds it to nine tricks) I cash all my tricks taking the certain finesse (they aren't opening 1NT on a stiff small club, and if they have, I will force a smile and congratulate them) I make +2. No-one else found it, two pairs were in 5♣, one making and one going one down.
As West I have to bid rather than pass expecting to make 4x
#9
Posted 2022-August-06, 16:41
When playing Landy against a Weak NT, it is usual to play 3♣ as constructive. The downside is that you have to give up on the WJO hand type. Whether this hand would instead qualify for a red 4♣ overcall is a matter of partnership style.
#10
Posted 2022-August-07, 01:17
Late to the thread but trying to be objective:
One cannot pass. It’s not just the idea that LHO may bid 2H that concerns me. LHO could do almost anything (including pass!) that would leave me thinking/knowing I should have bid before tgey get to exchange more information.
3C is clear…a conservative action mandated by the vulnerability.
The 3N call is well-judged. Sure, you might expect dummy to have a few more hcp, but he has a LOT more tricks than you expected, so you have no complaint.
As responder, I’d pass over3C. I don’t expect game to be bid, since maybe opener has the bulk of the remaining clubs and I have a smattering of hcp but not enough to take immediate action. Perhaps more importantly, I’m not sure what action to take.
The way I play negative doubles, they are passable by opener. They announce ‘ownership of the hand’, the occasional doubled partscore notwithstanding. This hand lacks the defence implied by a 3-level double.
I think playing 3D as hearts, invitational or better, 3H as spades, invitational or better, and 3S as diamonds, forcing, is a good method, but the hand isn’t strong enough to bid 3D then, over 3H, 3S.
But in balancing chair over 3N, I think 4C is very plausible. I’d be disappointed in myself were I not to make that call.
One cannot pass. It’s not just the idea that LHO may bid 2H that concerns me. LHO could do almost anything (including pass!) that would leave me thinking/knowing I should have bid before tgey get to exchange more information.
3C is clear…a conservative action mandated by the vulnerability.
The 3N call is well-judged. Sure, you might expect dummy to have a few more hcp, but he has a LOT more tricks than you expected, so you have no complaint.
As responder, I’d pass over3C. I don’t expect game to be bid, since maybe opener has the bulk of the remaining clubs and I have a smattering of hcp but not enough to take immediate action. Perhaps more importantly, I’m not sure what action to take.
The way I play negative doubles, they are passable by opener. They announce ‘ownership of the hand’, the occasional doubled partscore notwithstanding. This hand lacks the defence implied by a 3-level double.
I think playing 3D as hearts, invitational or better, 3H as spades, invitational or better, and 3S as diamonds, forcing, is a good method, but the hand isn’t strong enough to bid 3D then, over 3H, 3S.
But in balancing chair over 3N, I think 4C is very plausible. I’d be disappointed in myself were I not to make that call.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#11
Posted 2022-August-07, 04:07
mikeh, on 2022-August-07, 01:17, said:
Late to the thread but trying to be objective:
One cannot pass. It’s not just the idea that LHO may bid 2H that concerns me. LHO could do almost anything (including pass!) that would leave me thinking/knowing I should have bid before tgey get to exchange more information.
3C is clear…a conservative action mandated by the vulnerability.
The 3N call is well-judged. Sure, you might expect dummy to have a few more hcp, but he has a LOT more tricks than you expected, so you have no complaint.
As responder, I’d pass over3C. I don’t expect game to be bid, since maybe opener has the bulk of the remaining clubs and I have a smattering of hcp but not enough to take immediate action. Perhaps more importantly, I’m not sure what action to take.
The way I play negative doubles, they are passable by opener. They announce ‘ownership of the hand’, the occasional doubled partscore notwithstanding. This hand lacks the defence implied by a 3-level double.
I think playing 3D as hearts, invitational or better, 3H as spades, invitational or better, and 3S as diamonds, forcing, is a good method, but the hand isn’t strong enough to bid 3D then, over 3H, 3S.
But in balancing chair over 3N, I think 4C is very plausible. I’d be disappointed in myself were I not to make that call.
One cannot pass. It’s not just the idea that LHO may bid 2H that concerns me. LHO could do almost anything (including pass!) that would leave me thinking/knowing I should have bid before tgey get to exchange more information.
3C is clear…a conservative action mandated by the vulnerability.
The 3N call is well-judged. Sure, you might expect dummy to have a few more hcp, but he has a LOT more tricks than you expected, so you have no complaint.
As responder, I’d pass over3C. I don’t expect game to be bid, since maybe opener has the bulk of the remaining clubs and I have a smattering of hcp but not enough to take immediate action. Perhaps more importantly, I’m not sure what action to take.
The way I play negative doubles, they are passable by opener. They announce ‘ownership of the hand’, the occasional doubled partscore notwithstanding. This hand lacks the defence implied by a 3-level double.
I think playing 3D as hearts, invitational or better, 3H as spades, invitational or better, and 3S as diamonds, forcing, is a good method, but the hand isn’t strong enough to bid 3D then, over 3H, 3S.
But in balancing chair over 3N, I think 4C is very plausible. I’d be disappointed in myself were I not to make that call.
This shows the difference between a typical club player and a world class player, judging to finding a protective bid like 4♣ presumably showing a three suited hand. It also illustrates some of the luck element in duplicate. If you come across a pair capable of finding a bid like that in a mixed club field, you have lost the board when you have barely started it.
Page 1 of 1