BBO Discussion Forums: X,Y,Zee - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

X,Y,Zee

#1 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,134
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-April-27, 23:44

Playing XYZ how do you play 2 in this auction, asking or showing? I think standard , 4th suit is asking, does XYZ change anything?

1:1
1:2*
2
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#2 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,826
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-April-27, 23:55

never asking


always showing.

I think responder is captain on this auction.
1

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-April-28, 06:18

To me it is very obviously showing 4 cards in spades*, however I have never played 4th suit forcing on any auction by opener.

*:2 might promise an unbalanced hand also for some people but that is another question.
0

#4 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,134
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-April-28, 07:28

View PostFluffy, on 2011-April-28, 06:18, said:

To me it is very obviously showing 4 cards in spades*, however I have never played 4th suit forcing on any auction by opener.

*:2 might promise an unbalanced hand also for some people but that is another question.

Hi, 2 is not 4sf, 2 created the game force.
With spade control why wouldn't opener bid 2N?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#5 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,198
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2011-April-28, 07:49

2 shows spades. 2NT would show a balanced hand.

What if you have a balanced hand and four spades? I think 2NT is best. 2 has quite a wide range and it may get overloaded if it contains 12-14 balanced in addition to 11-18 4414/4405.

What if you have a balanced hand without a spade stopper? I think 2, the most economical bid, is best, unless you are happy to bid 2NT without a spade stopper. 3 on a 3-card suit may be more natural but it gets overloaded if it contains unbalanced (1435, 1436) as well as balanced hands.

What if you have an unbalanced hand with a spade stopper but less that four spades? I think 2NT is ok with 3415 if 12-14 points, at least if the diamond is an honour. Otherwise 3 with a 6-card suit or otherwise 2.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
1

#6 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,134
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-April-28, 07:55

Here's the hand Q975, AK52, V, AT654

1:1
1:2*
?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-April-28, 08:01

This is definetelly a 2 bid
0

#8 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,134
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-April-28, 08:03

Q975, AK52, V, AT654

Now what

1:1
1:2*
2:3
?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#9 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-April-28, 08:53

View Postjillybean, on 2011-April-28, 08:03, said:

Q975, AK52, V, AT654

Now what

1:1
1:2*
2:3
?


I'd try 3. I'm unclear if we are going to play 3N, 5 or higher, but all I know is that I'd rather be describing my hand rather than v.v..
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-April-28, 08:53

4
0

#11 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2011-April-28, 11:03

Yep, 4C. If partner wanted to play 3NT opposite this hand, she shouldn't have tempted us.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#12 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,134
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-April-28, 17:06



It appears all roads lead to the unmakeable 5
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#13 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,826
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-April-28, 17:27

south for me has a clear 2c bid in xyz and walsh; not game force 2d so:

1c=1d
1h=2c!
2d!=3c(invitational)
?
0

#14 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2011-April-28, 20:55

Perhaps we can upgrade our Qx enough to force to game, if partner plays soundish openers.

The original question about 2S is a good one. I will add it to the list of reasons I have soured on XYZ. (I was briefly a fan, mostly as a means of tricking partners into playing 1-1-1-3 auctions as natural and forcing, accepting the cost of wasting a 2-level bid to avoid an argument.)
0

#15 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-April-28, 21:52

View Postjillybean, on 2011-April-28, 17:06, said:



It appears all roads lead to the unmakeable 5


Unlucky!
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users