where?
#1
Posted 2009-October-06, 13:20
♥AJ64
♦KQT94
♣5
third seat, all white, imps.
1♣ - (1♠) -
what is your plan?
(if you double, p rebids 2♣)
#2
Posted 2009-October-06, 13:39
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#3
Posted 2009-October-06, 13:56
#4
Posted 2009-October-06, 14:13
matmat, on Oct 6 2009, 02:20 PM, said:
♥AJ64
♦KQT94
♣5
third seat, all white, imps.
1♣ - (1♠) -
what is your plan?
(if you double, p rebids 2♣)
X and pass
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#5
Posted 2009-October-06, 14:56
I will not distort my hand with a double, only for the sake of being able to stop in 2♣ instead of 3♣.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#6
Posted 2009-October-06, 15:15
OleBerg, on Oct 6 2009, 03:56 PM, said:
I will not distort my hand with a double, only for the sake of being able to stop in 2♣ instead of 3♣.
Distort?
And the reason isn't to stop lower in clubs although that is nice too, it's to not miss hearts when LHO bids 2♠ or 3♠.
#7
Posted 2009-October-06, 17:36
jdonn, on Oct 6 2009, 04:15 PM, said:
OleBerg, on Oct 6 2009, 03:56 PM, said:
I will not distort my hand with a double, only for the sake of being able to stop in 2♣ instead of 3♣.
Distort?
And the reason isn't to stop lower in clubs although that is nice too, it's to not miss hearts when LHO bids 2♠ or 3♠.
Amen to this! In fact not doubling may be masterminding the hand.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#8
Posted 2009-October-06, 21:57
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#10
Posted 2009-October-06, 22:38
#11
Posted 2009-October-06, 23:10
aguahombre, on Oct 6 2009, 11:38 PM, said:
Scares you?
x and 2♦
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#12
Posted 2009-October-07, 01:02
#13
Posted 2009-October-07, 01:03
gnasher, on Oct 7 2009, 02:02 AM, said:
Yes I think it can definitely be that hand and is not a forward going bid at all. I'm simply betting on 2D being a better partial than 2C.
#14
Posted 2009-October-07, 01:05
X and 2 ♦ would be gameforcing with a one suiter to me, so this is out.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#15
Posted 2009-October-07, 01:34
gnasher, on Oct 7 2009, 02:02 AM, said:
For me - and I believe in standard neg doubles - Dbl then 2D shows a weaker hand than the one shown.
I double and then pass, misfit.
#16
Posted 2009-October-07, 01:36
peachy, on Oct 7 2009, 02:34 AM, said:
gnasher, on Oct 7 2009, 02:02 AM, said:
For me - and I believe in standard neg doubles - Dbl then 2D shows a weaker hand than the one shown.
I double and then pass, misfit.
You're too strong to bid 2D ergo you pass?
#17
Posted 2009-October-07, 02:12
peachy, on Oct 7 2009, 02:34 AM, said:
gnasher, on Oct 7 2009, 02:02 AM, said:
For me - and I believe in standard neg doubles - Dbl then 2D shows a weaker hand than the one shown.
I double and then pass, misfit.
How can double followed by 2♦ be weaker than double followed by pass?
What is opener supposed to bid with 2=3=3=5 and no spade honor?
Rainer Herrmann
#18
Posted 2009-October-07, 02:43
rhm, on Oct 7 2009, 03:12 AM, said:
peachy, on Oct 7 2009, 02:34 AM, said:
gnasher, on Oct 7 2009, 02:02 AM, said:
For me - and I believe in standard neg doubles - Dbl then 2D shows a weaker hand than the one shown.
I double and then pass, misfit.
How can double followed by 2♦ be weaker than double followed by pass?
What is opener supposed to bid with 2=3=3=5 and no spade honor?
Rainer Herrmann
1N obv
#19
Posted 2009-October-07, 07:24
Codo, on Oct 7 2009, 02:05 AM, said:
X and 2 ♦ would be gameforcing with a one suiter to me, so this is out.
I guess that means a direct 2♦ is not forcing?
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#20
Posted 2009-October-07, 07:32
pooltuna, on Oct 7 2009, 10:24 PM, said:
Codo, on Oct 7 2009, 02:05 AM, said:
X and 2 ♦ would be gameforcing with a one suiter to me, so this is out.
I guess that means a direct 2♦ is not forcing?
I would rate that 80% of my pick ups and 95 % of the guys I know play NFB here, so yes, I would assume it.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...

Help
