Benellis58 GIB bashing on repeat Groundhog Day
#1501
Posted 2026-May-16, 05:32
https://www.bridgeba...HQ%7Cmc%7C11%7C
#1502
Posted 2026-May-16, 11:32
At trick 6, he slides the diamond queen...which WINS.
At trick 7, he plays his remaining diamond, the three, and...rises with dummy's ace.
Did he REALLY think that the GIBBO robot (!) in the North would be CAPABLE of playing low on the first diamond if he had the king? It was a GIBBO robot, the lowest of the low, the worst of the worst. It wasn't Zia or some other superstar!
https://www.bridgeba...DJ%7Cpc%7CC9%7C
#1503
Posted 2026-May-16, 11:44
https://www.bridgeba...S6%7Cmc%7C12%7C
#1504
Posted 2026-May-16, 12:06
https://www.bridgeba...HJ%7Cpc%7CH9%7C
#1505
Posted 2026-May-16, 12:18
https://www.bridgeba...C2%7Cpc%7CS8%7C
#1506
Posted 2026-May-16, 14:07
He is indeed correct. North's 2H was described, in a typically pathetic GIB definition, as "New suit - 3+ diamonds; 4+ hearts; 21- HCP; 16-22 total points".
"New suit": Yes, Mr. GIB, I think THE WORLD realizes that 2H is a "new suit" in this auction. I think THE WORLD knew that even before reading your very annoying, very unnecessary, very useless, very insulting first three words. Why must you persist in beginning so many of your miserable definitions with such pointless claptrap?
"21- HCP": This literally means zero to 21, Mr. GIB. It is so broad and vague that it is completely useless. Here's a suggestion: Instead of such sloppy, lazy, open-ended, meaningless bilge, how about defining a point range within a limited enough context at both the lower and upper ends that it will actually be useful to players?
"16-22 total points". Pulled MAGICALLY out of thin air, as usual, with absolutely NO scientific basis - not surprisingly, since GIB has shown time and again that it lacks even a minimal, basic understanding of what "total" points are. Furthermore, look at the mismatch between the impossibly vague "21- HCP" and the more narrowly defined, but totally random, "16-22 total points". I think any reasonable person would assume, as OMAR did, that North has a GOOD hand. Even GIBBO itself presumably assumed this, since in this MANDATED auction, it now leapt to 3NT with the South cards.
North's ACTUAL hand was this lackluster, uncompelling, piece of dogmeat: K104, Q752, A852, QJ...a hand that looks like it should have just passed South's passed hand, nonforcing 2C. And if North foolishly decided that he MUST bid with his rag, 2NT would be a better description than his LUDICROUS 2H, which any COMPETENT player would take as a reverse.
https://www.bridgeba...HJ%7Cpc%7CSK%7C
#1507
Posted 2026-May-16, 14:42
In reference to this hand, OMAR wrote "Hand from the day before-not Just Declare. Most common result, occurred at 30 tables. Unhappy to see my partner North preempt and then bid again. Typical 5-0 offside trump break too."
Yes, 4S is a ridiculous, UNDISCIPLINED act - the act of a solipsistic narcissist who thinks that rules do not pertain to HIM, and the act of a "bridge player" so fantastically ignorant of the game that he never learned the elementary precept that a pre-empter is not supposed to voluntarily speak again. NO ONE invited North to join the party.
BTW, look at the piece of garbage that masquerades as the GIB definition of East's double of 4S: "7-18 total points". Typically vague and ridiculously broad statement about "total" points (a concept that GIB doesn't even understand), and NOTHING else. Is partner expected to pass, to bid, or to do Lord knows what? Is the double for penalty, takeout, card-showing, DSI, what? Does it show 9 solid diamonds, the four lowest clubs, the Curse of Scotland, the beer card, two voids,...what the Hell DOES it show? We're left to guess, because the pitiful, useless GIB definition says NOTHING except "7-18 total points" - TOTAL points yet - points that GIB has repeatedly demonstrated it can't understand. And yet, while this definition FAILS miserably in even a BASIC explanation of what the double shows (which is crucial information), GIB goes out of its way...in this same auction...to USELESSLY inform us that West's 3H is an "Overcall". And South's 3S? THAT is defined as "2+ spades". That's IT, that's ALL. According to GIB's typically useless and sloppy definition, South COULD have TWO spades or he COULD have 13, since (here we go AGAIN) "2+", with no upper limit, literally means 2 to 13...and the definition says NOTHING else about South's hand. TOTALLY useless "information", yet it was enough (enough of NOTHING!) to persuade North to abandon all discipline and repeat his spades - UNASKED - at the FOUR level. GIBBO is an embarrassment!
https://www.bridgeba...CA%7Cpc%7CHT%7C
#1508
Posted Yesterday, 13:10
The board was played 48 times. 42 of those times, including at my table, the contract was a NORMAL 3NT. All 42 declarers made (an "impossible") 11 tricks, thanks to the ALWAYS expected hopeless "defending" by the truly execrable GIBBO robots. We all received a complete average on the board: 50 %.
At two tables, NS...AMAZINGLY...stopped in ONE (!) NT, where the two human Souths, obviously operating, opened the TWENTY-point hand with ONE (!) NT. At those tables, the declarers ALSO made 11 tricks, but they each scored only 3.19 % on the board, as they obviously did not receive the game bonus.
At one table, on another bizarre auction with the human South operating, NS reached SIX (!) NT. He took "only" 10 tricks, thereby going two down, and obviously scoring zero %. I will discuss THIS result in post #1510.
At the final table, NS scored a clear top pf 100 % for making 3H...doubled...with an overtrick. I will discuss THIS result in post #1509.
At MY table and presumably 41 others, "defender" West characteristically and of COURSE stupidly, slapped his partner East in the face by foolishly and unilaterally IGNORING East's double of 3C, choosing, GIBBO imbecile that he is, to instead lead a low heart (the 5) from AK75. Dummy North tabled the 10984 of hearts and declarer South called for the 4. East, West's obviously ANNOYED "partner", played the 6 (from 632 tripleton - Lord knows why!), and declarer South won the jack from his QJ doubleton.
At trick two, South continued with his queen of hearts. You know, this MIGHT have presented a TINY (ha, ha!) clue to anyone with an IQ over ZERO that maybe, just maybe, continuing HEARTS would NOT be a good idea for the "defenders". But of COURSE the GIBBO robot in the West did not have such an ELEVATED level of IQ...so the TERMINALLY ignorant GIBBO M.O.R.O.N. ...continued (!) HEARTS! He won his king at trick two. Fair enough. THAT makes sense. And then he BELATEDLY shifted to a club, right? No! Wrong! Pay attention! I said he was a...GIBBO robot (the LOWEST of the low, the WORST of the worst), so the malignant DRUDGE...next...CASHED HIS HEART ACE (!) before FINALLY switching to clubs. Too late, IMBECILE (West), because you (West) have just set up declarer's ELEVENTH trick by PERSONALLY establishing dummy North's last heart.
How is it even POSSIBLE for ANY "bridge player" to be this PHENOMENALLY inept hand...after hand...after revolting, disgusting hand? The GIBBO robots rot.
Okay, here's the link to my table. Read the next two posts to see the I.D.I.O.C.I.E.S. that occurred at two other tables.
https://www.bridgeba...D5%7Cmc%7C11%7C
#1509
Posted Yesterday, 13:41
Okay, at this table NS made 3h doubled plus an overtrick to score 100 % on the board, while the GIBBO robots (aka: total imbeciles) added another complete zero to their award-winning lifetime collection of total failures.
WHY were NS in 3H doubled instead of the normal 3NT? Well...East passed, South opened 2NT, West passed, North bid 3C Stayman, and East doubled to show good clubs. All normal so far.
But then, rather than bidding what seems to be a "normal" 3D, as almost ALL human Souths did, South passed. West passed, and North bid 3H. Okay, even those actions are not unreasonable. But the next one sure as HELL is, because the SUPERTWIT in the East (yes, he IS a GIBBO robot - how did you guess?) now...DOUBLED (!!!!!) 3H.
"Well," you might be thinking, "GIB definitions are KNOWN for being pathetic, hopeless, monumentally stupid, and often just plain WRONG, so maybe the poor simpleton was just doing what he was SUPPOSED to do according to a lamebrained GIB definition."
Nope.
The GIB definition was "Takeout double - 3+ diamonds; 2- hearts; 3+ spades; rebiddable clubs; 12 total points", so IT was not to blame.
East's HAND for his insane, non-systemic double was...974, 632, 54, KQ1085! Do YOU see "3+ diamonds"? Because I see the miserable little 54 doubleton. Do YOU see "2- hearts"? Because I see three of them: the (also) miserable little 632. Do YOU see "12 total points"? Because I see a mere FIVE (!) HCP, ALL in clubs, and I see absolutely NO reason on EARTH to add even a SINGLE point to the HCP in order to elevate the "total" points.
https://www.bridgeba...SQ%7Cpc%7CC8%7C
#1510
Posted Yesterday, 14:27
Here the human South tried an operation that turned out unsuccessfully, which explains why his partnership ended up in 6NT instead of the normal 3NT. The purpose of this post is not to discuss that, as this thread is never about bashing humans. It is always about bashing GIB or GIBBO robots, as Diana so eloquently expressed in the title she gave to this essential thread that she so wisely created back in August of 2025. At that time, she had probably not guessed that the thread would have accumulated over half a million views in the eight months since its creation. I certainly would not have expected that, but I guess I underestimated the huge number of BBO members and customers who are disgusted by the inept GIBBO robots and enjoy reading about their foibles. Please though, dear readers, never forget that the bashing always has a POSITIVE goal: Namely, to alert the powers that be to the enormous number of problems with the GIB definitions, the GIBBO system, and the GIBBO robots - ALL in the hope that they will either be HUGELY improved, or - better yet - REPLACED by COMPETENT robots. Then and only then will BBO have a platform that will TOTALLY please its users and supporters. That will obviously be VERY beneficial not only to those same users and customers, but ALSO (and perhaps to an even greater degree) to BBO itself, by ensuring increased member/customer loyalty (in an era where OTHER bridge platforms are also coming into prominence) and by attracting NEW members and customers to what is currently an excellent bridge site in numerous ways but that is harmed by the horrid presence of its reprehensible GIBBO robots.
Here's what's "amusing" about THIS hand at THIS table. At the 42 tables where NS played the NORMAL contract of 3NT, East doubled 3C but West STUPIDLY ignored the double and STUPIDLY led and continued hearts, as I documented in post # 1508. Here, against 6NT, West had an EXCELLENT reason to lead HEARTS, NOT clubs. First, HERE he was on lead against...DUH...SIX no trump and he was LOOKING AT the AK of hearts in his OWN hand, so of course it was OBVIOUS to lead hearts. Second, HERE...on THIS auction, his partner East merely PASSED throughout, as he never had a chance to show good clubs with a double.
BUT...West was...ON LEAD (!) with an OBVIOUSLY CASHABLE two TOP tricks (the AK of hearts), yet he PASSED (!) 6NT! He did NOT double it! And even beyond THAT absurdity, he led the heart king (bravo - well done) and then at trick two...shifted...yes, I said SHIFTED (!!!) to a club! He did NOT cash the SETTING TRICK ...against a SLAM, he SHIFTED! Now, he lucked out and the slam failed anyway, but what IF the "operating" South had had some weird hand where he actually HAD 12 tricks as long as the SETTING trick was not cashed?
So, West's failure to double, coupled with his failure to cash the setting trick are funny examples 0f GIBBO cluelessness and ineptitude, but what's ALSO funny is that when West was URGED by his partner to lead clubs, he IGNORED the advice and led hearts, yet HERE, where his partner East never asked, told, or suggested ANYTHING,...HERE (against a SLAM!), West cashed ONLY one heart (as opposed to his playing the suit forever and ever after his partner showed CLUBS and after DECLARER played HEARTS in 3NT!), and then SHIFTED...BLINDLY in this case to clubs! Moral: If your "partner" is one of those pieces of trash known as a GIBBO robot and you WANT a specific suit led, whatever you do: DON'T bid the suit and DON'T make a lead-directing double of it, or your GIBBO "partner" will NEVER lead it! Just pass or bid ANOTHER suit and then he probably WILL (blindly!) lead the one you actually want. GIBBO robots absolutely stink at bridge.
https://www.bridgeba...CK%7Cpc%7CCJ%7C
#1511
Posted Yesterday, 14:36
Further proof not only that these GIBBO bozos are among the worst "bridge players" of all time, but also that spot cards are MEANINGLESS to them AND that EVEN if "partner" signals correctly, the signal will be ignored!
Why, why, why are BBO users saddled with these completely USELESS pieces of garbage?
https://www.bridgeba...H5%7Cmc%7C10%7C
#1512
Posted Yesterday, 14:46
Note that in the hopeless, antiquated, GIBBO joke of a system, if North happens to have both five spades and four hearts, and if South is OBLIGATED to bid 3S rather than 3H over North's 3D NMF call, it will be IMPOSSIBLE to reach the presumably SUPERIOR 4-4 heart fit, as North will raise 3S to 4S.
The GIBBO system, like the GIBBO robots, is absolute garbage...empowered by the pathetic GIB definitions.
https://www.bridgeba...H7%7Cpc%7CSQ%7C
#1513
Posted Yesterday, 17:37
https://www.bridgeba...CHT%7Cmc%7C9%7C
#1514
Posted Yesterday, 17:55
"3+ spades"? Never mind the "plus" - the sack of trash doesn't even have THREE - he has TWO! And "11-12 total points"? Where ARE they, Mr. East, you magnificent nitwit?
North is no hero either. At trick 8, he VERY stupidly plays his SIX of clubs instead of CORRECTLY playing his SEVEN. Was he PURPOSELY trying to mislead me (his "partner"!)? Or was it just the ten millionth example of how these sophomoric dweebs treat all spot cards as interchangeable equals? Whichever of those two questions we're replying to, the correct answer will be "North is a M.O.R.O.N., just like ALL of his GIBBO brothers and sisters."
https://www.bridgeba...S8%7Cpc%7CC4%7C
#1515
Posted Yesterday, 18:08
https://www.bridgeba...DK%7Cpc%7CH9%7C
#1516
Posted Yesterday, 18:17
They DO, however, LOVE leading enemy suits, so I guess that explains why this intellectual wizard led a...SPADE (declarer's KNOWN first suit!)...INTO declarer, thereby allowing declarer an easy 13 tricks.
I'd use the tired cliché and say that GIBBO robots are "as dumb as rocks", except that...I wouldn't want to insult ROCKS!
https://www.bridgeba...S8%7Cmc%7C13%7C
#1517
Posted Yesterday, 18:43
He also passes at his SECOND turn. Okay, I'll be (very) generous and say that MAYBE he is hoping that the auction will die in 1NT and he can cash a bunch of spades. What's that you say? Hey, don't get mad at ME - I said that I was being very generous!
He FINALLY enters the auction...at his THIRD opportunity to do so...with a takeout double of North's 2D. This is very good, because it now gives his partner West the chance to...
Show what an absolute I.D.I.O.T. he is. The feebleminded trout bids 3D (!) because these sickening losers LOVE making imbecilic cue bids at the three level or higher. Why is the jackass cuebidding? East PASSED as dealer and PASSED again over North's 1NT, where the auction might easily have ENDED. East can NOT have a big hand, and West has a mere 10 HCP himself, plus, as far as he knows, no particularly enticing fit in either major, since, as per the GIB definition of the double, East could have as few as four cards in each.
Incredibly, it gets even worse! East bids 3S, and West - who has ALREADY overbid with his ridiculous 3D cuebid, now raises (!) his PASSED-HAND "partner" to FOUR spades! Needless to say, NEITHER 3D nor 4S conformed to his own GIB definitions.
The ignorance of these GIBBO garbage cans is deep and neverending, NEVER ending!
https://www.bridgeba...CCJ%7Cmc%7C9%7C
#1518
Posted Yesterday, 18:52
I make TEN tricks...and my game...despite having FOUR "inescapable" losers (a club, two hearts, and a spade)...because Captain Knucklehead COLLAPSED his OWN side's winners.
https://www.bridgeba...S7%7Cmc%7C10%7C
#1519
Posted Yesterday, 18:59
3.45 % on the board for him and his equally C.R.E.T.I.N.O.U.S. "partner". 96.55 % for his grateful NS opponents.
You know, somehow I don't think the top bridge pros need to worry about their sponsors firing them and hiring GIBBO robots!
https://www.bridgeba...H3%7Cmc%7C11%7C
#1520
Posted Yesterday, 19:06
https://www.bridgeba...SJ%7Cmc%7C12%7C

Help
